Mapping your blog mind

A few days ago I discovered Brown Hen’s “del.icio.us mind” - a tool for visualizing your del.icio.us bookmarks in mindmap format. At the time I wondered about how to mindmap blogs (rather than bookmarks). Now (via Suw at Headshift), Ben Hammersley has pointed the way forward by swapping his Movable Type categories for del.icio.us tags.

Looks like you should be able to combine these two to mindmap your blog. Quite apart from that, the more I think about Ben’s script, the more it fits the “small but very powerful” camp.



Sergiy & Semantic Blogs

Another new find for me is Sergiy’s Blog. He’s got a very nice piece on blogs and the Semantic Web.

“blogs make the perfect basic units for a human-driven semantic web (just like neurons are the perfect basic units for a brain). Of course, this kind of a semantic web is an emergent behaviour rather than an intentional construct (anthill vs. bridge, to use cliche images), and I think that we’ll need far more blogs-per-capita for it to really kick in …
the actual web part of the semantic web is always changing and keeping itself fresh. For someone who isn’t into complexity and neural nets, that may not seem like a big deal, but believe me that it very much is”

Spot on. Really spot on.



The Very Delicious Mind

Ian Oeschegerat Brown Hen has developed the beginnings of what looks like a wonderful tool. [Thanks to Monsieur Shirky for the pointer]Using mind-mapping software called FreeMind

“delicious_mind is a Python script that makes a mind map out of your del.icio.us links, a web-based tool I’ve also been using/playing-with quite a lot. The script [pretty] [src] uses the del.icio.us api to get your tags and (by default) your hundred most recent posts and build a spartan looking mind map out of them.”

I’d LOVE to be able to do the same not with del.icio.us bookmarks but with blog posts as well!
Anyway, think I need to sort myself out with del.icio.us rather than furl. Nice work, Ian!



Couple of finds

Patternhunter and Tim’s Scalefree.net look to have some interesting posts. Will be keeping an eye on them.



Innocence & The Wisdom of Crowds

A couple of months ago I was called up for jury service. I have to say I was excited - human interest, curiosity at how decisions were made behind the scenes, and a little bit of “see how groups work” enthusiasm. I also have to say that, when I was “behind the scenes”, I surprised myself by doing something I cannot remember doing since I was seventeen (barring at loved ones). I shouted long and hard someone.

The case was a short one, thankfully not rape or murder, but still had the possibility of a five year sentence. We sat and listened to the witnesses, barristers and judge for 4 days.

read on »



Quick Question

Just interested to find out the answer to this: how many of your posts do you scramble off and click publish, and how many do you labour over, thinking long and hard about them?

Me, I’d say 1 in 4 is scrambled. Anyone else?

And contrary wise, what types of post do you end up reading and how often? Roughly.



MeshForum, Cascades and The Inquisition

Have just found the useful blog MeshForum which is run by Jack Vinson and company.

One entry that caught my eye was on ways of defending networks against cascading failure. The failure they talk about is primarily physical networks, but it seems to have import for human networks, especially if you view heresy - or for that matter innovation - as an attack.
read on »



Actions and deeds

In today’s time-pressed, multi-channel, super-digital, info-complex, densely networked working environment every second counts, and even the slightest edge over your competitors can mean success.

In such time-sensitive, information-rich environments, knowledge workers productivity comes down to one question: “Can you action that?”

Noticeable now, though, is the growing trend among success stories of this new era to hone even their language so that it is sleek, adaptable, modern and efficient. No longer are they talking of “actioning”.

No. These bright young things are talking of “doing”.



The One, The Many and The Fractal

Seems everybody’s talking about emergence, bottom up behaviour. Which is fine (though personally “bottom up” still reminds me of a something you say in the pub).

There’s also quite a lot of chatter about Personal Knowledge Management vs Collective Knowlege Management. Which is fine again.

What I find less fine is that these two types of KM gets treated in a believers and heathens manner, by both “sides”.

So I’d like to suggest, m’lud, that, if we are going to talk about bottom-up emergence etc, and swallow the complexity system pill, then we swallow the whole pill.
read on »



The Blind Men and The Elephant

Still on the poetry tip … here for “theologic” read “knowledge”, “top-down”, “bottom-up” or anything like that and it seems to hold .. (it’s a reworking of an old Indian parable by the way)

It was six men of Indostan
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind.

The First approached the Elephant,
And happening to fall
Against his broad and sturdy side,
At once began to bawl:
“God bless me! but the Elephant
Is very like a wall!”

The Second, feeling of the tusk
Cried, “Ho! what have we here,
So very round and smooth and sharp?
To me `tis mighty clear
This wonder of an Elephant
Is very like a spear!”

The Third approached the animal,
And happening to take
The squirming trunk within his hands,
Thus boldly up he spake:
“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
Is very like a snake!”

The Fourth reached out an eager hand,
And felt about the knee:
“What most this wondrous beast is like
Is mighty plain,” quoth he;
“‘Tis clear enough the Elephant
Is very like a tree!”

The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
Said: “E’en the blindest man
Can tell what this resembles most;
Deny the fact who can,
This marvel of an Elephant
Is very like a fan!”

The Sixth no sooner had begun
About the beast to grope,
Than, seizing on the swinging tail
That fell within his scope.
“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
Is very like a rope!”

And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!

So oft in theologic wars,
The disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean,
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!

John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887)


Maps, Sense & Holub

In the poem below, Miroslav Holub immortalised a bizarre incident that happened to a group of soldiers on military manoeuvres in Switzerland.

“The young lieutenant of a small Hungarian detachment in the Alps
sent a reconnaissance unit out onto the icy wasteland.
It began to snow
immediately,
snowed for two days and the unit
did not return.
The lieutenant suffered:
he had dispatched
his own people to death.

But the third day the unit came back.
Where had they been? How had they made their way?
Yes, they said, we considered ourselves
lost and waited for the end. And then one of us
found a map in his pocket. That calmed us down.
We pitched camp, lasted out the snowstorm and then with the map
we discovered our bearings.
And here we are.

The lieutenant borrowed this remarkable map
and had a good look at it. It was not a map of the Alps
but of the Pyrenees”

Miroslav Holub, Brief Thoughts on Maps. TLS, Feb 4, ‘77

Perhaps good information gets too good a press?