<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Monkeymagic &#187; MIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monkeymagic.net/tag/mit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net</link>
	<description>thoughts on thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Teaching the Art of Problem Solving</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/03/24/teaching-the-art-of-problem-solving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/03/24/teaching-the-art-of-problem-solving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piers Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem_solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanjoy_Mahajan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/03/24/teaching-the-art-of-problem-solving/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This MIT lecture by Sanjoy Mahajan was, I thought, well worth watching.
 
He talks about a range of things.  Mainly how the art of problem solving is distinct from the skill of pattern matching, and how to cultivate the former.
He identifies the following types of problem solving approaches (as some):

Reducing to already solved cases
Look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://techtv.mit.edu/tags/227-the/videos/96-the-art-of-problem-solving">MIT lecture</a> by Sanjoy Mahajan was, I thought, well worth watching.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="437" height="370" id="viddlerplayer-2fa3d26e"><param name="movie" value="http://www.viddler.com/simple/2fa3d26e/" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoplay=f" /><embed src="http://www.viddler.com/simple/2fa3d26e/" width="437" height="370" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" flashvars="autoplay=f" allowFullScreen="true" name="viddlerplayer-2fa3d26e" ></embed></object> </p>
<p>He talks about a range of things.  Mainly how the art of problem solving is distinct from the skill of pattern matching, and how to cultivate the former.</p>
<p>He identifies the following types of problem solving approaches (as some):</p>
<ol>
<li>Reducing to already solved cases</li>
<li>Look for simple/extreme cases to look for pattern</li>
<li>guessing</li>
<li>symmetry</li>
<li>be lazy</li>
<li>use good representations (e.g. drawings), and</li>
<li>analogy</li>
</ol>
<p>And in terms of teaching them he recommends the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>Name the types of approach (so you can recognise what you</li>
<li>Diversity of examples to use the technique in (and not the same problem rephrased)</li>
<li>Ask yourself Wheeler&#8217;s Question: &#8220;What one or two sentences could you tell your earlier self (the self that hadn&#8217;t solved the problem yet) that would make the solution really easy?&#8221;.  This is essentially a shorter version of Gladwell&#8217;s Outlier idea.  It is deliberative practice rather than just practice per se, and makes sure you are actually learning from the <em>right </em>kind of practice.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/03/24/teaching-the-art-of-problem-solving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Links for May 30th</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2007/05/31/links-for-may-30th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2007/05/31/links-for-may-30th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piers Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geocoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeymagic.net/2007/05/31/links-for-may-30th/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Scratch means that children can programNew MIT tool from Mitch Resnick et al that&#8217;s worth looking at &#8211; uses a building block concept.Tags: code children MIT 
BBC Backstage :: Feeds &#38; APIs :: Postcoder&#194;&#160;ApiWill be interested to see what they come up with and how they deal with the Post Office copyrightTags: BBC code geocoding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6647011.stm">Scratch means that children can program</a><br/>New MIT tool from Mitch Resnick et al that&#8217;s worth looking at &#8211; uses a building block concept.<br/>Tags: <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/code">code</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/children">children</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/MIT">MIT</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/data/PostcoderApI?v=msy">BBC Backstage :: Feeds &amp; APIs :: Postcoder&Acirc;&nbsp;Api</a><br/>Will be interested to see what they come up with and how they deal with the Post Office copyright<br/>Tags: <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/BBC">BBC</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/code">code</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/geocoding">geocoding</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/API">API</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2007/05/31/links-for-may-30th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MIT Weblog survey</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2005/06/28/mit-weblog-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2005/06/28/mit-weblog-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piers Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeymagic.net/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, this is truly heartening to know &#8230; 

[hat tip to julian]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, this is truly heartening to know &#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://blogsurvey.media.mit.edu/request"><img src="http://blogsurvey.media.mit.edu/images/survey-statistic.gif" alt="Take the MIT Weblog Survey" style="border:none" /></a></p>
<p>[hat tip to <a href="http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2005/06/27/mit-weblog-survey/">julian</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2005/06/28/mit-weblog-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackmore-Dennett Overkill</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/12/01/blackmore-dennett-overkill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/12/01/blackmore-dennett-overkill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piers Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fanaticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeymagic.net/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On  frustration with the vagueness of memes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about the MIT notes, and last few days reading about memes. Personally feeling like a bit of a party pooper. The meme idea has begun to have a few whiffs of fanaticism about it.  Maybe fanaticism is unkind &#8211; over-enthusiasm.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Copernican revolution&#8221; &#8211; that we exist to help memes/culture evolve rather than the other way around &#8211; is provocative, and certainly stops and makes you think.  I like the metaphor &#8211; it&#8217;s catchy &#8211; and I like the idea of trying to use the evolutionary models for cultural progress.  But it&#8217;s all so <em>vague</em>.</p>
<p>Harrumph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/12/01/blackmore-dennett-overkill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MIT Notes &#8211; Quick Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/12/01/mit-notes-quick-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/12/01/mit-notes-quick-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2003 12:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piers Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeymagic.net/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jottings on some MIT Notes on talks with Dennet, Blackmore and Pinker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>[The meme bits of the <a title="MIT Notes" href="http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/lecture.pdf">notes</a> (see below) are on pages 61 and following.]</em></p>
<p><u>1.  Meme definition</u><br />
- Susan Blackmore defines a meme as &#8220;<i>that which can be imitated</i>&#8221;<br />
- One problem with this is the definition&#8217;s looseness.<br />
- Dan Dennet defines a meme as &#8220;<i>a packet of cultural information</i>&#8221;<br />
- In this definition, memes spread like symbionts, invading the cultural host.<br />
- Still doesn&#8217;t allow clear meme identification</p>
<p>- Both definitions perhaps capture too much &#8211; memes can be 4 note jingles, pop songs or albums.<br />
- NB. Darwin developed theory of evolution without a clear idea of what a gene was.<br />
<span id="more-15"></span><br />
<u>2. Is Memetics a science?</u><br />
- For Memetics to be a science it has to be able to generate empirically testable hypotheses<br />
- Blackmore and Dennet&#8217;s definitions too broad to be able to do this usefully.</p>
<p><u>3. Are memes unique to humans?</u><br />
- Both Dennett and Blackmore want to say yes<br />
- Parrot Problem, i.e. how can a parrot copy what you say if memes are unique to humans?</p>
<p><u>4. How do memes replicate?</u><br />
- Needs to be a distinction between the unit of replication (e.g. the song) and the machinery of replication (e.g. the mp3 burner etc)<br />
- This is blurred in both Dennett and Blackmore&#8217;s accounts<br />
- Blackmore posits that &#8220;memes are (perhaps blindly) responsible for the creation of everything from the<br />
stylus to the scroll to the satellite&#8221;.</p>
<p><u>5. Memetics and the evolution</u><br />
- Any precision in memetics comes from the evolutionary algorithm<br />
- Memetics, though, hinges on artificial selection<br />
- By doing this it loses much of its explanatory power.</p>
<p><u>Links:</u><br />
MIT Notes (PDF): <a title="MIT Notes" href="http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/lecture.pdf">http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/lecture.pdf</a><br />
Susan Blackmore: <a title="Susan Blackmore's homepage" href="http://www.susanblackmore.co.uk/">http://www.susanblackmore.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/12/01/mit-notes-quick-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MIT Lecture notes on memes</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/11/28/mit-lecture-notes-on-memes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/11/28/mit-lecture-notes-on-memes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piers Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeymagic.net/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Link: MIT Cog Sci Lecture Notes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just quickly wanted to post this &#8211; will hopefully get a chance to read it and report back tomorrow. Looks pretty interesting (though long) &#8211; and I think the relevant bits for my little project are pp. 61 ff.</p>
<p><u>Link:</u><br />
MIT Cognitive Science Lecture Notes [PDF] &#8211; <a title="MIT Cognitive Science Lecture Notes" href="http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/lecture.pdf">http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/lecture.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2003/11/28/mit-lecture-notes-on-memes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
