<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Monkeymagic &#187; rating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monkeymagic.net/tag/rating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net</link>
	<description>thoughts on thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Technology Review: Can You Trust Crowd Wisdom?</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/09/18/technology-review-can-you-trust-crowd-wisdom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/09/18/technology-review-can-you-trust-crowd-wisdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piers Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisdom_of_crowds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/09/18/technology-review-can-you-trust-crowd-wisdom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Niki Kittur, an assistant professor at CMU who studies user collaboration on Wikipedia and was not involved with Kostakos&#39;s work, says that providing more information about voting patterns to users could also be helpful. Kittur suggests that sites could create ways to easily summarize and represent other users&#39; contributions to reveal any obvious biases. &#34;There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Niki Kittur, an assistant professor at CMU who studies user collaboration on Wikipedia and was not involved with Kostakos&#39;s work, says that providing more information about voting patterns to users could also be helpful. Kittur suggests that sites could create ways to easily summarize and represent other users&#39; contributions to reveal any obvious biases. &quot;There are both intentional and unintentional sources of bias,&quot; says Kittur. &quot;In the end, what we really need [are] tools and transparency.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/web/23477/?a=f">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/09/18/technology-review-can-you-trust-crowd-wisdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Links for March 2nd</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/03/03/links-for-march-2nd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/03/03/links-for-march-2nd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Piers Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/03/03/links-for-march-2nd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
russell davies: fair play&#8220;where this thing really scored is in an element I&#8217;ve not noticed in a lot of the talk about play &#8211; fairness. And kids are utterly, utterly obsessed with fairness. It&#8217;s the most important element in any game. And human rule-enforcement is automatically deemed unfair. There is no referee, umpire or god-like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://russelldavies.typepad.com/planning/2009/02/fair-play.html">russell davies: fair play</a><br/>&#8220;where this thing really scored is in an element I&#8217;ve not noticed in a lot of the talk about play &#8211; fairness. And kids are utterly, utterly obsessed with fairness. It&#8217;s the most important element in any game. And human rule-enforcement is automatically deemed unfair. There is no referee, umpire or god-like grandparent that can escape being seen as unfair at some point, for some decision. But the commanding voice of Cosmic Catch escapes all that. The relentless, ineluctable judgement of the RFID machine brooks no argument, is prey to no human frailties and biases and is immediately seen as fair. Or actually Fair. Or even FAIR.</p>
<p>All of which makes for better playing. &#8220;<br/>Tags: <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/games">games</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/children">children</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/rfid">rfid</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/toys">toys</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/fairness">fairness</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.evanmiller.org/how-not-to-sort-by-average-rating.html">How Not To Sort By Average Rating</a><br/>[via anu]CORRECT SOLUTION: Score = Lower bound of Wilson score confidence interval for a Bernoulli parameter
<p>Say what: We need to balance the proportion of positive ratings with the uncertainty of a small number of observations. Fortunately, the math for this was worked out in 1927 by Edwin B. Wilson&#8221;<br/>Tags: <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/maths">maths</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/statistics">statistics</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/programming">programming</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/rating">rating</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/algorithms">algorithms</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://academicearth.org/">Academic Earth &#8211; Video lectures from the world&#8217;s top scholars</a><br/>&#8220;Thousands of video lectures from the world&#8217;s top scholars.&#8221;<br/>Tags: <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/reference">reference</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/video">video</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/education">education</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/videos">videos</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/free">free</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/monkeymagic/university">university</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monkeymagic.net/2009/03/03/links-for-march-2nd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
